Multitasking — No, You Didn’t

icon

Multitasking — No, You Didn’tMultitasking

 

You can’t do more than one thing at a time.

My hubz swears on all that is holy, and then swears again on all that is UN-holy, that multitasking is something he can do — that he is able to do more than one thing at a time. I will admit, he is pretty good at it sometimes. He can definitely chew gum and walk at the same time, which makes him a winner.

 

Don’t even try. Especially if you’re a gamer.

But more often than not I can tell if he is trying to carry on a phone conversation with me while playing COD. He gets very … distant. He hardly responds at all, & when he does, it’s only the briefest of nods: “Yeah. Uh-huh. Okay. No. Right.” Sounds like he is totally blowing me off. I generally hang up on him when he turns into gamer-mode-guy, because I seriously do NOT want to compete. I shouldn’t have to. I wash the undies. I win. Game over.

 

PinocchioMy hubz isn’t the only liar.

I am always struck by the multitasking phenomenon that has swept our busy society. Instead of looking for perfection, or productivity, we seek out mediocrity at best.

 

Attempting Multitasking leads to Mediocrity.

Who can get the most accomplished?

Screw skilled labor!

Slop that shit down and move on!

“It ain’t gotta be perfect!” ← true statement at one place of employment which shall remain unnamed, at which I worked for less than one week. It was a movie theater.*

No one is perfect

I admit I am a bit of a perfectionist… but really? Is that such a bad thing? You want me to apologize for taking pride in a job well done? That’s utter rubbish! If I’m not expected to put my “all” into it, I would rather skip out altogether, thanks. Because I am also really lazy, and any excuse to put hard work aside is aces in my book!

 

The lazy perfectionist. An oxymoron? No, I don’t think so. Either do it, and do it well, or drop it like a fucking hot potato. That’s my motto.

 

INTERLUDE: A Note on the positives of Perfectionism.

Except for sometimes. Because sometimes Perfectionism freezes me up, at which point Perfection is the enemy of Productivity and Progress. But that’s another topic altogether. Right now we’re discussing ON-PURPOSE sucking at life.

 

While this mindset has definitely held me back in many areas of my life — for example, we’ve lived in this house for over five years yet still have hardly any pictures or art on our walls — I have seen what the opposite mentality accomplishes: Lots of framed doo-dads all over the place, crooked as all hellz. That house is ugly. Avoid it all costs. Also, the owner is a mean bitch. Just sayin’…

 

One might suggest that at least in the second example, the work was attempted, if imperfectly. Good point. But irrelevant for the purposes of this post. Chipped fingernail polish is not prettier than skipping it altogether with the understanding that I will do a really lousy job or that the work will take a really long time to complete to my (ridiculously high) standards.

 

You’re telling me THIS is a job better attempted half-ass than not at all?

I’ve stated in the past that I get really involved in whatever I’m reading. So much so that a distraction can scare the doo-doo out of me, causing a reaction which in turn scares the doo-doo out of the perpetrator. I don’t shift attention easily; I focus HARD CORE. This definitely has its drawbacks — like when the hubz is trying to talk at me but I can’t hear him because damn it to hellz I’m working over here! But mostly it’s a good thing. Well that’s my opinion anyway. My husband might disagree, but that has no bearing here.

 

(Like HE’S to be trusted;

he doesn’t even believe that afghans

possess magical healing properties.

Stupid-head.)

 

It’s a good thing that I focus on one thing at a time because it means I’m IN IT TO WIN IT. I’m not half-assed. I’m all for realz. And I know I’m right in this because… wait for it… science says so.

 

The cover of Scientific American’s March/April issue was dedicated to the topic of multitasking. The article opens with a quote attributed to Albert Einstein:Scientific American Multitasking

 

“Any man who can drive safely

while kissing a pretty girl

is simply not giving the kiss

the attention it deserves.”

 

An NPR article states that humans are not actually able to concentrate on similar skill sets at the same time — like tweeting while you’re trying to order a coffee — because all that communication junk clogs up the same part of the brain. So what people are actually doing is switching back and forth between the two. I am jealous of this skill, because I cannot rotate my attention that way. If most people are an oscillating fan, my button is stuck in one position — STAY.

 

On a similar note, the BBC reports that multitasking too many tasks at once actually causes a drop in IQ. By talking to me while shooting Xbox baddies, my husband’s intelligence is shrinking. I KNEW IT!

 

Even Penelope Trunk insists that “multitasking is bad,” and she asks that we admit it and get on to learning better time management skills. Penelope is scary, so if my hubz isn’t going to listen to me, he should really take her advice. Otherwise he might have to find someone else to wash his undies.

 

*Side Note: Don’t order butter on your popcorn. Theater staff does not clean the butter-squirter-container. You are eating ages-old yellow plastic being passed off as yummy buttery goodness. Do not be fooled.

Don’t Use My Name Like You Know Me


Addressing me by my first name in emails and form letters to make your correspondence seem more personal…‏ is just plain creepy, particularly if we’ve never even spoken to each other. As I have subscribed to more and more blogs, I’ve noticed a disproportionately large amount of the senders talking to ANDI like we’re old pals. Sometimes I have to stop and think about what I’m reading — Who the hell is this author again now?

 

As the Caterpillar asked Alice: Who. Are. You?

I don’t mind when businesses use my first name in correspondence if it’s a business I have actually patronized, and if the individual penning the letter has a clue who I am. For example, it’s okay when Debbie from Your Scrapping Cafe does it… because we’ve actually met and would recognize each other on the street and have even exchanged personal emails from time to time. Also, she is my friend. Well, I hope she is my friend. I like her an awful lot. Wait — you ARE my friend, right Debbie???

 

Dear Scary People: Please Don’t Talk to Me. Love, Andi-Roo.

On the other hand, Ramit from the personal finance blog I Will Teach You to be Rich is kind of… rough. He’s fucking scary, actually. Like almost as much so as Chelsea Handler or Penelope Trunk. I don’t know if I could handle either Chelsea or Penelope addressing me in any fashion whatsoever, much less by first name. I might poop my pants if that ever happened. Ramit talks mad at people and I’m always afraid he will find out I’m broke and come yell in my face about it. So I don’t really like that his email salutations pretend we are chums.

 

You hear that, Ramit? I’m afraid of you! Stop using my first name!

Be afraid. Be very, very afraid.

This whole thought process made me wonder if people are scared of ME in any way. I know I can be a bit growl-ish. I’m also very judge-y, and not afraid to call someone out if I think they are being stupid. Wouldn’t it be funny if Ramit, Chelsea, and Penelope were all sitting around at a bar drinking margaritas and whatnot, talking about that scary bitch Andi-Roo? ← Now see, my name alone inspires no fear. Andi-Roo sounds gentle, fun, and exciting. She sounds like a right good time.

Dear moms: Please don’t name your baby girls Loretta. That is all.

I read an article recently called “Names that Make You Shudder” which discussed the feelings associated with someone’s name. For example, I can never find love in my heart for someone named Loretta, because that bitch was so mean at me that just the sound of her name would inspire instant hate. I’m sorry to all you innocent Lorettas out there; you must bear the shame of that one Loretta who gave you a bad name… so to speak. Contrary to this, I will always find a way to forgive a Lola. I knew one of those and she was so awesome-kewl-funny that I have to believe she spoke for the entire Lola Nation.

Names are an important key

to what a society values.

Anthropologists recognize naming as

‘one of the chief methods

for imposing order on perception.’

~David S. Slawson

And what about Voldemort? Or Cain? Or other evil people? Could you ever carry on a conversation with someone bearing the name of PRIME BADNESS? I actually know a kid named Cain, and he is a pretty decent fellow, but I have to wonder WTF his mom was thinking. Kind of mean trick, if you ask me.

I wonder how Cain would feel if Ramit wrote an email to him?

“Dear Cain, blah-blah-blah. Sincerely, Ramit” ← creepy, right?

Names, once they are in common use,

quickly become mere sounds,

their etymology being buried,

like so many of the earth’s marvels,

beneath the dust of habit.

~Salman Rushdie

I wouldn’t mind becoming a household habit. Say it: Andi-Roo. Andi-Roo. Andi-Roo.

Penelope Trunk says: Divorce is immature and selfish — do you agree?

icon

DivorceDaggone You, Penelope Trunk!

Penelope Trunk wrote a very controversial post entitled “Divorce is immature and selfish. Don’t do it.” Normally I love her blog, because it’s personal and weird and informative and brimming with drama and slightly reminds me of myself. Not that I want to be friends with Penelope, per se, for the same reason I would avoid being friends with my very favorite comedienne, Chelsea Handler: These are some scary bitches. Much like myself, they are straight-up and tell it like it is, but in even more brazen fashion than I. Neither is afraid to call someone out. They are my idols — but from afar. One might take this to mean that I can dish it out but don’t like it served. One might be correct. But this usually isn’t a problem for me, because anyone silly enough to call me out isn’t around long enough to feel the burn, and thus would not cause me to pee my pants in fear. Penelope and Chelsea — they make me want to run and hide.

 

All this is to say Penelope Trunk

that I love reading Penelope’s blog and would seldom feel the urge to dissent from her opinion. However, I actually felt compelled to write a comment on her blog, stating the reasons I disagree with her stance on what she perceives as “the evils” of divorce. This should have been the end of it. But this particular piece sat on me all night, choking me with frustration. Because she is so very, very wrong!

 

Her first argument states 

that divorce is cliche, in the sense that if I feel I can’t be a good parent if I’m unhappy in my relationship, then I’m being selfish to get out of it. Poop on that! I was in a marriage for five years in which my then-husband ignored me and had no interest in working on our issues in counseling. I didn’t want to stay with someone who made it clear he had no interest in me. And I didn’t want my kids to emulate this emptiness in their adult relationships. As a parent, it’s my responsibility to teach my kids they are deserving of love and friendship. I can’t really expect them to believe me if I’m in a loveless and friendless marriage.

 

PathAlternatively, 

I’m now in a very happy marriage with a guy who was my best friend for several years before we ever hooked up. We listen to each other. After five years of romantic involvement, I think I’m providing an excellent example of what love is supposed to be like. I’m not saying the kids weren’t impacted by the split; they were and still are negatively affected. But they were likewise affected when our cat passed away, or any other number of sad events. Sad things happen, and families have to work through them. Life is not a static thing that will stand still. It’s an ever-evolving path down which we struggle or frolic or crawl or swim as the occasion calls. It’s up to us to teach our children to be strong in the face of adversity, and to appreciate the joys that come unexpectedly on the wind.

 

All this is very poetic, but ultimately what I’m trying to say is this — we’re all fucked up together, and happily so, which is better than being fucked up and unhappy besides.

 

Penelope’s second argument states Dog Peeing

that divorce is terrible for kids. Well no shit. So is dog piss on the carpet in my office, or talking in class when you weren’t supposed to, or a fire burning down the house, or a parent getting laid off. We try to shield our kids from these terrible things as best we can… and then we try to teach our kids from them as best we can… and then our kids grow up to make their own fucked up choices, and we don’t hold it against them because, hey, we had a stupid dog that pissed on the rug at one time too. And oh yeah, we also had our fair share of crappy relationships. Who needs a hug? Anyone? Anyone?

 

Her third point states

that divorce is for dumb people. Well count me among the dumb, I guess. I do have a degree, and I write better than most people I know, so obviously I’m not entirely incapacitated, but who am I to argue with Penelope? Dumb but happy in love, that’s me!

 

My husband, however, 

has never been divorced — I’m the only wife he’s ever had — so is he dumb? I could write a whole post on this topic alone, because this is a trick question — of course he’s dumb — he’s a man! But that isn’t what we’re discussing herein. No, for the purposes of this post, my husband is most decidedly not dumb. Should a never-been-married man avoid a divorcee like the plague? Or does the math somehow even out if he, too, has some college in his background? My kids love him and call him “dad” since he, not the ex, is the one raising them. They might have some ugly words for anyone calling either of us dumb. I say let them be the judge!

 

InsaneNext point: Divorce reflects mental illness. 

This one isn’t really fair, because I had mental illness way before I ever met my ex. You may not have gleaned that I am a crabby-cake suffering from depression. While it is no longer debilitating, for several years it kept me trapped. So in my case, divorce actually reflected mental health because I finally left a toxic relationship, met with a counselor, got on the correct dosage of prescription medication, and found a decent partner. I no longer need someone to “save” me, because I have learned how to save myself. My mental illness is reigned in and under control. This never, ever would have happened had I stayed in my previous marriage.

 

Divorce is a career issue? Not applicable in my case, so I cannot comment to this.

 

The person is bored? 

Well, if wanting to kill yourself (literally) qualifies as boredom, then yes, this was a contributing factor in my divorce. For all the reasons stated above, I stand by my choice.

 

Victim of violence — 

I have so much to say about this that I will have to take it up another day. For now let it be enough for me to say that if you’re getting smacked around, receiving bruises and broken bones, you’re an ass if you choose to stick it out. The cancer-brained cretin committing the violence is likely uninterested in seeking help, and you can’t fix that alone. Draw all the boundaries you want, but an abusive spouse isn’t going to be told what to do by the spouse he’s busy punching. Meanwhile, your kids are watching this unfold and learning that it’s okay for bullies to take advantage of the weak, and that the weak deserve their sorry lot in life.

 

Fuck that, Penelope. wrestling

Maybe you like getting beat up, but most of the rest of us prefer our bones to remain unbroken. Maybe you like the lessons your kids are learning, but I like that my 18-year-old, state-qualified wrestler of a son protects those less strong than he. And I like that my 7-year-old daughter knows that nobody has the right to touch her inappropriately.

 

I do not wish in any way to glorify divorce. 

It certainly is never a decision to be made lightly. Sometimes it really is better to stick it out, if there is something to be salvaged and both parties are in it to win it. I take umbrage to the blanket statement that divorce is immature and selfish. Like many things in life, it certainly can be both of those things. But it doesn’t have to be, and in many cases — mine, just to name one — it isn’t.

 

Divorce can be the best thing that ever happened. 

 

Are you divorced? Why?

How did it impact your children? Your life?

 

 

***DISCLAIMER: This post is “from the vault”. My Bloggy-Blog recently crashed. This was an item we were able to save thanks to the Black Box we recovered from the wreckage. There will be more items along this line as we salvage more survivors. *** 

Open Letter Invitation to Haterz

This is post #69.Haterz T-Shirt

I’ll wait while you giggle. Go ahead, get it out of your system.

Done? Good.

My brother-in-law suggested

I write about the difficulty of facing certain positions, in a “tongue in cheek” fashion. You’ll be glad to know that I decided against going this direction. Some scenes are better left unimagined.

Moving on… 

I was examining other posts lately and noticed the biggest and best blogs 69seem to have an awful lot of HATERZ. And it made me think — where do you pick up those fools? I wanna get me some HATERZ, too. Do you have to sign up for a club membership? “HATERZ, Anon. Get your hate on!”

I guess I should take it as a compliment 

that I haven’t said anything over the line yet to piss off anyone too badly. But I’m preparing myself for the moment when someone decides I’ve gone too far. Which probably isn’t very long from now, because I’m pretty tacky. Except for avoiding the 69 issue. That was fairly UN-tacky of me, I believe.

 When the HATERZ comeGold Star to my bloggy-blog,

which surely they eventually will, I intend to handsomely reward their interest and enthusiasm. Not with money or anything fabulous along those lines. Still, there will be prizes.

The more poorly written comments will receive GOLD STARS. The more atrocious the grammar and sentence structure, the more GLITTER shall be tossed. I am very excited about this plan. There will be much fun-making. I plan to enjoy myself immensely at someone else’s expense.

Purple HeartBut not every comment will be contributed by a dunder-brained fool. Some HATERZ will be intelligent meanie-pantsez. Upon these cruel bastards I shall bestow the coveted PURPLE HEART award, for being brave enough to face my wrath, and for surviving the battle of words. This may sound irreverent, insinuating I make light of a soldier’s plight. But I served in the U. S. Army (no, for realz), so I assure you I’m not crossing any lines here. Also, one time I got lost in a field exercise and TOTALLY should have received this honor for not losing my shit. It was epic. And another time I almost fell off a cliff in Hawaii because the night vision goggles were too foggy and made me feel all claustrophobic so I took them off.

Spoiler Alert: I survived.

Here are some of the future comments I am looking forward to receiving:

“OMG Andi-Roo, you are so obnoxious, why don’t you get a life, you disgusting whore?”

—Not arguing with the accusation of obnoxious-ness. Totally true. I do have a life I enjoy, though. I’m not a whore, as the sex I have doesn’t return me any dollars. I obviously didn’t marry for money.

“Your stance on this issue is understandable given that you are a dumb bitch.”

I actually happen to be a SMART bitch, thank you very much.

“I’m only following you to see what stupid drama you next get yourself into.”Yale University

Awesome! Might I recommend some other fucked up individuals you might enjoy hating? Try Penelope Trunk or Jenny Lawson AKA The Bloggess. They are sure to fill your quote of drama. Tell ‘em I sent you. Jenny owes me fifty-cents anyway.

“You should quit blogging because you have nothing to offer.”

My mom says I’m smart enough to go to Yale. So fuck off, ya wanker. Also, my husband was voted among the Top Five Hottest Guys working at Dayton Mall Borders, which means I am married to a local celebrity. What’s your claim to fame, hmmm? Also, one time I wrote to the editor’s section of a comic book and they published my letter. Oh, burn!

UFC“Aren’t you ashamed that one day your children will read this?”

I should be so lucky that my blog will still be around when my seven-year-old is interested in reading blogs. As it is, my eighteen-year-old thinks I’m fucking hilarious. He also works out with werewolves on a regular basis* and is training with UFC guys to be a cage fighter** — and don’t forget this is the same young man who went to State for wrestling — so you might want to watch what you say about his mama.

These seem to comprise the entirety of the HATERZ comments. I think I’m ready. Are you? How do YOU deal with HATERZ? Is it a source of excitement in your life, as I anticipate it will be in mine?

*Totally not true. There is no such thing as werewolves. Obviously.

**Absolutely true. I worry for his face and hope he doesn’t get cauliflower ears.

icon

Diversity Among Mice

Penelope Trunk wrote about Diversity. 

She wasn’t referring to skin color, however, which is what usually comes to mind when that word pops up in conversation.Diversity among mice Instead she used the term in its denotative, rather than connotative, sense. For the challenged, this means that she used the word in correct context per dictionary definition, as opposed to the spirit of the word or the feelings it evokes.

The immediate, gut reaction is… 

that we are about to talk about race, and that it could possibly get ugly. But at its base, diversity merely refers to variety or differences or even contradictions (meanings courtesy of Dictionary.com). And this doesn’t have to deal with the way people look. Mixed nuts is a good example of diversity, or maybe a kitchen sink salad.

 

Mixed NutsGood on Penelope for bringing the word Diversity back into context! The differences to which she referred mainly dealt with two separate ways of life: Country Mice vs. City Mice.

 

Sure, a few commentators noted that there is a middle ground, somewhere in the lands of suburbia, but on the whole, Suburbia is really neither / nor, fence-sitters who want their cake and plan to eat it too.

 

On the one hand, Suburbanites are kind of wanna-be Country Mice — they moved far enoughDairy Cow away from the city so that they can have grass without the bother of chickens or goats or pigs.

And on the other hand, Suburbanites are also kind of wanna-be City Mice — they stayed close enough to the city so they can still hit the malls and pick up fast-food for dinner on the way home from their work commute. Milk without the trouble of going through a cow.

 

We can argue all day as to whether or not Suburbia represents yet a third way of life, but eventually it will be a moot point because of a little thing we like to call Urban Sprawl. Oh, and also over-population, but that’s a topic for another post.

 

Futuristic CityThis is how I imagine a panicked conversation might go: 

“Oh dear, there goes the neighborhood! Don’t let the slums get you — run, for goodness sakes, run while you still can — out to the country!” So truly Suburbanites are at their root merely lazy Country Mice who just haven’t realized yet that they are doomed. That’s okay — we of the farmlands are doomed too, just at a slower pace. Have you not seen all the dystopic literature floating around out there? The whole world will be one giant ghetto at some point in the future. So simmer down, Suburbanites, I wasn’t trying to get your goat. So to speak.

 

Back to the original premise: 

Country Mice vs. City Mice, and the diversity of lifestyles therein. Penelope and many of her city-minded followers contend that their crowd are more intelligent and fast paced, while country folk are more inclined to creativity and the relaxed pace of a snail. To some degree, I would judge this to be correct.

 

[What makes me a capable judge? (a) I've lived all over the world in all kinds of settings. (b) It's my planet. No for realz.]

 

Consider how many artists come from middle-America,Kurt Vonnegut 

which for the geographically clueless (including me up until about the age of 30, at which point I realized how small this world is, and exactly how stupid are most of her occupants) is where the Country is located. We’ve got funny man David Letterman, the much-missed Kurt Vonnegut, and the late great Michael Jackson from Indiana. Ohio offers up Erma Bombeck, Toni Morrison, Paul Newman, and Steven Spielberg.

 

[Interesting fact about Ohio: seven of our U.S. presidents claimed the Buckeye State as home. Does this indicate politicians grow up on corn and have a proclivity for being creative? Based on the way many of them answer questions, methinks yes.]

 

Hillbilly GolfSo what can we draw from this? 

The farmland celebrities listed herein all inhabit creative fields (no pun intended), which indicates they fit the bill for having time on their hands to stew the juices of imagination. Yet I can’t wrap my brain around the idea that any of them are yokels, hicks, or outright dumb-dumbs. That image just doesn’t work here. In spite of backwoods school systems, hayrides, and hillybilly golf, somehow we’ve managed to cook up entire bushels of intellectuals.

 

Maybe Country Mice beat out City Mice altogether? Thought to ponder, from my lily pad on the small pond of Farmersville, Ohio.